|
1
|
- Vivian Navas
- PROMISE-CARE Coordinator
- Department Assessment Committee Coordinator
- March, 2004
|
|
2
|
- Introduction
- Graduating Student profile
- Faculty profile-course profile
- Course Portfolio
- Example of Assessment Results
|
|
3
|
- PROMISE Program
- Department Assessment Committee
- (TEAM)
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- 3.5 years
- Results
- Posters
- PROMISE Annual Reports (www.uprm.edu/promise/reports)
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Vivian Navas - Coordinator
- Inés Sastre
- Carlos Ríos Velázquez
- Ana Vélez
- Donato Seguí
- Allen Lewis
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Implement a systematic assessment plan throughout the curriculum
- Disseminate assessment tools and assessment results among faculty
- Revise courses and curriculum according to assessment results
- Provide evidence of the excellence in the teaching/ learning process in
the Biology Department.
|
|
11
|
- I- Program Assessment
- Course/Student Profile Correlation
- Senior students and alumni perception of the curriculum
- Student and Mentor Undergraduate research assessment
- PROMISE Assessment Data (2000, 2001 and 2002 PROMISE Progress Reports)
|
|
12
|
- II Teaching/Learning Assessment
- Course Portfolio
- Skills and knowledge course assessment
- Department faculty and course evaluation forms
- Laboratory coordinators and TA’S assessment
- PROMISE/CARE laboratory assessment-Portfolio
- Undergraduate seminar course
assessment
- Pre and Post General Biology test
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- El Departamento de Biología
desarrollará en cada profesor y alumno el pensamiento crítico, el
entusiasmo, la iniciativa y las destrezas necesarias para que sea un
eterno estudioso de la Biología.
Se hará énfasis en los conceptos básicos y la investigación en un
ambiente que promueva el desarrollo de profesionales con sensibilidad
social, cultural y humanística, y con profundos valores éticos. Así aportará al enriquecimiento de la
ciencia y la sociedad mediante la creación y diseminación de nuevo
conocimiento a través de la investigación científica.
|
|
15
|
- Skills and Values
- Critical thinking and problem solving
- Team work
- Communication
- Computer and its scientific applications
- Up to date scientific tools and techniques
- Contemporary scientific issues
- Ethical implications in science
- Lifelong learners)
- Scientific concepts
- Cell structure and physiology
- Organismal biology (zoology, botany and microbiology)
- Genetics: classical, population
and molecular
- Chemical, physical and mathematical applications to biology
- Ecology
- Evolution as a unifying science
|
|
16
|
- Form
- Prepare a skills and knowledge profile of your graduating student
- The students in the _____ Department will master the following skills
and knowledge upon completing our curriculum.
- What do the potential employees look for in your students?
- Profile should correlate with departamental and institutional missions
- Everything in the profile must be assessable.
|
|
17
|
- Skills and Values
- Critical thinking and problem solving
- through the scientific
method
- Team work
- Communication skills in Spanish and
- English
- Computer literacy and its scientific
- applications
- Knowledge of up to date scientific tools
- and techniques
- Awareness of contemporary scientific
- issues
- Awareness of ethical implications in
- science
- Ability to learn by him/herself (lifelong
- learning)
- Other
- ____________________
- ____________________
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- 25/39 faculty members (64%)
- and 2 laboratory coordinators
- ten core courses
- twenty- two biology elective
courses
- When more than one professor for
the same course completed the form, only those items marked by all
involved, was included.
|
|
22
|
- Critical thinking skills and contemporary scientific issues awareness
were identified as developed in all ten-core courses
- Communication and computer skills were identified as developed in 9 out
of 10 core courses.
- All other skills were developed in at least 60% of the core courses.
- Organismal biology, genetics and science applications were included in at least 80% of the
core courses.
- Cell and ecology concepts were included in 7 of the core courses.
- Skills were identified as developed in 60 to 90% of the elective
courses.
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Form
- To what part of the profile does your course contribute to?
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- Faculty says yes
- Students say yes
- We need to gather the EVIDENCE
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- Syllabus with measurable objectives
- Evidence: the best and worst
- Exam
- Homework
- Course projects
- Laboratory reports
- Assessment forms:
- Skills and knowledge course assessment
- Institution faculty and course assessment
- Other assessment (example):
- Pre and post test
- Written or oral report
- Teamwork
- One minute paper
- Number of critical thinking questions in exam answered correctly
- Actions taken according to assessment results to improve or correct
misunderstanding
- Any pertinent discussion
- Averages and/or grades w/o names
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
- www.uprm.edu/promise/assessment
- Engineering Assessment Tool Box
|
|
34
|
- Biology graduating student profile
- Graduating student profile form
- Course/student profile Correlation
- Course/student profile Correlation Form
- Portfolio Contents
- Course assessment form
- Curriculum assessment form
- TEAM and Promise web addresses
- TEAM Brochure
|
|
35
|
- Available at:
- PROMISE Annual Reports (www.uprm.edu/promise/reports/)
- TEAM Annual Report
- (Soon in TEAM Web Site)
|
|
36
|
- Teamwork, ethics, Oral Presentation and Written Report
- Workshop
- Course Assessment Form
- Undergraduate Research Assessment Form (faculty)
- Undergraduate Research Assessment Form (student)
- Assessing Faculty Knowledge in Computer
- Instrumentación y Técnicas en
Investigación Biológica
- Summer Workshop
- Avalúo de laboratorio
- Curriculum Assessment of Skills and Knowledge
|
|
37
|
- Continue to gain course information from each professor
- Complete the course and student profile correlation
- Disseminate the graduating student profile among faculty and students
- Offer students a general assessment form for their perception of how the
course assisted in their profile development
- Tabulate gathered data
- Inform faculty of results
- Course Portfolio
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Undergraduate Research Form
- RETO/MARC/SLOAN student assessment
- RETO Mentor assessment
- Off Campus Mentor assessment
- Research Workshop Assessment
|
|
40
|
- All students were evaluated as excellent in ability to follow scientific
methodology, organization, quality of contribution and skills such as
teamwork and communication
- Mentors considered students had a great potential for scientific
presentation
- All would want students again in their lab
- They evaluated the UPRM student’s performance as excellent.
- Recommendations: Improve written and oral English communication skills
|
|
41
|
- Faculty and course evaluation 39
Departmental faculty members obtained a
final average of above 3 in a 1-4 scale
- Action: The evaluation results were returned by the director to the
faculty with the questionnaire for their evaluation and proper action.
- The Departmental Assessment Committee developed a new form where
students will evaluate how each course contributed to them attaining the
student profile skills and knowledge.
- This will be correlated with the
faculty answers regarding the skills and knowledge their course aim to
develop.
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
- 43 teaching assistants evaluated effectiveness of their laboratory
coordinators (8 department faculty and 2 non teaching personnel)
- Effectiveness of TA meetings, supervision and organization
- 8 out of 10 coordinators were evaluated above 3 in a 1-4 scale.
|
|
44
|
- In 2003, 51 out of the 55 teaching assistants
- Evaluated by the students
regarding teaching performance
- All 51 teaching assistants were rated above 3 in a scale of 1-4 where 4 is best.
- Action: PROMISE and the Department has been offering teaching assistants
workshops on improving the teaching/learning process and on
incorporating ethics and technology into the courses.
|
|
45
|
- 50% of the students failed question 15 on meiosis.
- 0- 70 % of the students failed 6 other questions.
- In the General Biology II the average grade was ____
- Three questions were only less than 35% of the teaching assistants
answered correctly.
- Ten out of 19 questions were answered corrected by less than 70% of the
population.
- Action: Offer the exam to the
entire teaching assistants population
- The questions in the exam will be reviewed and modified as necessary.
- Possible actions are to require TAs to attend the lectures of their
laboratories to assist them in gaining the knowledge.
- Another possibility is to offer entering graduate students workshops on
general concepts to assist them in their teaching as well as graduate
studies.
|
|
46
|
- Data from the first year (Table __) show great improvement in knowledge
after taking the course.
- A detailed assessment report of this activity is present in the PROMISE
2003 annual report.
|
|
47
|
- Objectives:
- Systematically improve the teaching learning process in the Biology
curriculum by:
- Acquiring updated laboratory
equipment
- Modifying laboratory exercises to include computer-assisted learning
strategies and skills
development activities
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
- Fifteen laboratory exercises, out of the 23 offered in a year, were
modified and/or created
- Photosynthesis, cellular respiration and Ecology - CBL technology
- Genetics -Computer technology and hands on
- Human Genome Project Interactive Exercise
- Microscope- use of internet resources
- Microbiology- hands-on exercise
to identify antibiotic resistance
- Simplified molecular biology exercise
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
|