Efectividad

Entering mainstream: Auspiciado por el Sloan Foundation, sobre el estado de la educación en línea en los Estados Unidos. El el mismo participaron más de 1,000 universidades y de acuerdo a los resultados podemos decir que el futuro es muy halagador para esta modalidad de enseñanza:

1. Over 1.9 million students were studying online in the fall of 2003.
2. 40.7% of schools offering online courses agree that students are at least as satisfied with their online courses, 56.2% are neutral and only 3.1% disagree.
3. The majority of all schools (53.6%) agree that online education is critical to their long-term strategy.
4. Three quarters of academic leaders at public colleges and universities believe that online learning quality is equal to or superior to face-to-face instruction.

The no significant difference phenomenon: Thomas L. Russell

Características de  las instituciones que han logrado tener éxito en la enseñanza en línea

Internet Supported Learning Study

Six Factors to Consider when Planning Online Distance Learning Programs in Higher Education

 Guidelines for Distance Education

What makes the difference?


Achtemeier, S. D., Morris, L. V., & Finnegan, C. L. (2003) Considerations for developing evaluations of online courses. JALN 7(1)  http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n1/v7n1_achtemeier.asp

American Distance Education Consortium. (2000). ADEC Guiding principles for distance teaching and learning.  http://www.adec.edu/admin/papers/distanceteaching_principles

Bates, A. W. (1999). Developing and applying a cost-benefit model for assessing telelearning. NCE-Telelearning: Project 2.3. http://research.cstudies.ubc.ca

Cyrs, T. E. (2001). Evaluating distance learning programs and courses. http://www.zianet.com/edacyrs/tips/evaluate_dl.htm

Herrrington, A., Herrington, J., Oliver, R., Stoney, S.& Willis, J. (2001). Quality guidelines for online courses: The development of an instrument to audit online units. Inn G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, and T. Petrovic (Eds.) Meeting at the crossroads: Proceedings of ASCILITE 2001 (pp. 263-270). Melbourne: University of Melbourne. http://elrond.scam.ecu.edu.au/oliver/2001/qowg.pdf

Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000). Quality on the line. Benchmarks for success in Internet-Based Distance Education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.  http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Quality.pdf

Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications. (1999). Principles of good practice for electronically offered academic degree and certificate programs. http://www.wcet.info/projects/balancing/principles.asp.