Skip to content
259 Blvd. Alfonso Valdés Cobián(787) 832-4040
  • UPRM
  • Mi Portal
  • Library
  • Sports
  • Alumni
Top Bar EN
Facebook page opens in new windowX page opens in new windowYouTube page opens in new windowWebsite page opens in new window
CAEP – Acreditacion para la Preparacion de Maestros
Just another UPR MAYAGUEZ Sites site
  • UPRM CAEP
  • EPP Overview
    • Context & Unique Characteristics
    • Description of Organizational Structure
    • Vision, Mission, Goals
    • EPP’s Shared Values & Beliefs for Educator Preparation
    • Tables
  • Standards & Evidence
    • Specialty Licensure Area Data
    • Standard 1: Content & Pedagogical Knowledge
      • 1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards at Appropriate Levels
      • 1.2 Research & Evidence to Measure Students and Own Professional Progress
      • 1.3 Application of Content & Pedagogical Knowledge
      • 1.4 All P-12 Students Afforded Access to College and Career Ready Standards
      • 1.5 Model and Apply Technology Standards
    • Standard 2: Clinical Partnership & Practice
      • 2.1 Clinical Partnership and Practice – Partners Co-construct Mutually Beneficial P-12 Partnership
      • 2.2 Partners Co-select, Prepare, Evaluate, Support, and Retain High-quality Clinical Educators
      • 2.3 Partners Design High-quality Clinical Experiences
    • Standard 3: Candidate Quality, Recruitment, & Selectivity
      • 3.1 Recruits and Supports High-quality and Diverse Candidate Pool
      • 3.2 Sets Selective Admission Requirements
      • 3.3 Monitors Attributes and Dispositions Beyond Academic Ability
      • 3.4 Creates and Monitors Candidate Progress
      • 3.5 Candidate Positive Impacts on P-12 Students
      • 3.6 Candidates Understand the Expectation of the Profession
    • Standard 4: Program Impact
      • 4.1 Completer Impact on Student Growth & Learning
      • 4.2 Teacher Effectiveness
      • 4.3 Employer Satisfaction
      • 4.4 Completer Satisfaction
    • Standard 5: Provider Quality, Continuous Improvement & Capacity
      • 5.1 Effective Quality Assurance System that Monitors Progress Using Multiple Measures
      • 5.2 Quality Assurance System Relies on Measures Yielding Reliable, Valid, and Actionable Data
  • Cross-cutting Themes
  • Selected Improvement Plan
  • Self-Study Report Addendum
    • New Evidence
Search:
  • UPRM CAEP
  • EPP Overview
    • Context & Unique Characteristics
    • Description of Organizational Structure
    • Vision, Mission, Goals
    • EPP’s Shared Values & Beliefs for Educator Preparation
    • Tables
  • Standards & Evidence
    • Specialty Licensure Area Data
    • Standard 1: Content & Pedagogical Knowledge
      • 1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards at Appropriate Levels
      • 1.2 Research & Evidence to Measure Students and Own Professional Progress
      • 1.3 Application of Content & Pedagogical Knowledge
      • 1.4 All P-12 Students Afforded Access to College and Career Ready Standards
      • 1.5 Model and Apply Technology Standards
    • Standard 2: Clinical Partnership & Practice
      • 2.1 Clinical Partnership and Practice – Partners Co-construct Mutually Beneficial P-12 Partnership
      • 2.2 Partners Co-select, Prepare, Evaluate, Support, and Retain High-quality Clinical Educators
      • 2.3 Partners Design High-quality Clinical Experiences
    • Standard 3: Candidate Quality, Recruitment, & Selectivity
      • 3.1 Recruits and Supports High-quality and Diverse Candidate Pool
      • 3.2 Sets Selective Admission Requirements
      • 3.3 Monitors Attributes and Dispositions Beyond Academic Ability
      • 3.4 Creates and Monitors Candidate Progress
      • 3.5 Candidate Positive Impacts on P-12 Students
      • 3.6 Candidates Understand the Expectation of the Profession
    • Standard 4: Program Impact
      • 4.1 Completer Impact on Student Growth & Learning
      • 4.2 Teacher Effectiveness
      • 4.3 Employer Satisfaction
      • 4.4 Completer Satisfaction
    • Standard 5: Provider Quality, Continuous Improvement & Capacity
      • 5.1 Effective Quality Assurance System that Monitors Progress Using Multiple Measures
      • 5.2 Quality Assurance System Relies on Measures Yielding Reliable, Valid, and Actionable Data
  • Cross-cutting Themes
  • Selected Improvement Plan
  • Self-Study Report Addendum
    • New Evidence

New Evidence

You are here:
  1. Home
  2. New Evidence

New Evidence

  • UPRM COI Reliability Report
  • UPRM COI Reliability Technical Study
  • Amended and Extended Annual Admission Entry Indices and GPA Averages Table
  • CAEP Analysis Items 2017
  • Cooperative Teacher Syllabus
  • Evidences of Meeting and Trainings on Assessment Procedures and Instruments
  • Faculty Meetings – Agendas, Attendance Lists & Minutes
  • InTASC Performance Summary and Charts – EDPE 3129 Blog Assignment
  • InTASC Planning Performance Summary and Charts – EDPE 3129 Blog Assignment
  • ISTE Performance Summary and Charts – EDPE 3129 Blog Assignment
  • List of Acronyms for UPRM CAEP Self Study Reports and Documents
  • List of Lessons – Cooperative Teacher Course DECEP
  • PE Analysis Observation Items
  • PE Plan de Clases y Enseñanza
  • PE Student Teaching Evaluation Instrument 2015
  • PCMAS 2017 Data
  • PR CEEB Median Aptitude Scores for 2013 to 2015
  • Research Report of UPRM TPP Program Impact Mixed Methods Study
  • Rubric Aligned with InTASC and ISTE – EDPE 3129 Blog Assignment
  • Service Learning Instrument Reliability Report – EDES 4006
  • UPRM CEEB Admission Scores by Year
  • Jobs
  • Partnerships
  • Acreditations
  • Right to Know
  • Policies
  • Privacy
  • Emergencies
Bottom Menu
Go to Top